How to Resolve Disputes from Non-Compete Clauses in India

Introduction

Disputes from non-compete clauses in India when employers try to enforce restrictions on employees. Non-compete agreements are commonly used by many businesses to protect their trade secrets, client lists, and proprietary business information. However, these types of clauses often result in lawsuits regarding non-compete clauses, particularly in competitive fields. Many employers use non-compete agreements to secure their trade secrets, client rosters, and proprietary business information. Nonetheless, these clauses may sometimes be perceived by employees as restrictive and inequitable, which can lead to legal disputes.

Disputes over non-compete clauses are especially common in industries such as technology, finance, and healthcare. Such disputes are often due to imperfectly drafted agreements or imprecise restrictions. It is important to note that if the client is asking you not to join the competitors, this may not be enforceable due to Indian courts regularly striking down non-compete clauses that the courts consider to be unreasonable or having effects that are inconsistent with public policy.

This article will cover everything you need to know about non-compete clause disputes, including the underlying law, common disputes, real-world case studies, practical resolution steps, and actionable drafting tips.

What is a Non-Compete Clause?

A non-compete clause is a contract between an employer and an employee that prohibits the employee from:

• Working for a competitor in a defined geographic area.
• Starting a competing business.
• Engaging in any activities harmful to the employer’s business interests.

Companies add these clauses to employment agreements to protect intellectual property, trade secrets, and competitive advantages.

Essential Elements of the Non-Compete Clause

1. Duration: How long after you stop working for the company the restriction is enforced.
2. Geographical Scope: The geographical area where the employee is restricted from working.
3. Competitor Restrictions: Specifies what the employee cannot do, including soliciting clients or employees, etc.

Although these clauses can be helpful to employers, they must balance protecting business concerns alongside respecting employees’ rights.

Legal Framework Governing Non-Compete Clauses in India

The enforceability of such non-compete restrictive covenant agreements in India is mainly regulated by the Indian Contract Act, of 1872 and some key judicial interpretations.

Important aspects of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872

• Section 27: All agreements in restraint of trade are void except in case of goodwill or sale of business.
• Public Policy: Indian courts consider restrictions that infringe upon an individual’s right to livelihood would be against public policy.

Judicial Precedents

1. Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century Spinning & Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
   • Implemented non-compete covenants during employment, when reasonable.
2. Superintendence Company of India v. Krishan Murgai
   • Post-employment non-compete clauses deemed restraint of trade and invalidated.
3. Percept D’Mark v. Zaheer Khan:
   • It was held that the contracts conflicting with public policy would not be upheld.

Factors Courts Consider

• Reasonableness: Duration and geographical scope, as well as restrictions on the activities of the party in question, must be reasonable.
• Legitimacy: If the clause legitimately safeguards business interests.
• Proportionality: If the restraint is too burdensome for the employee.

An appreciation of these legal principles will assist both employers and employees in determining whether their agreements may be enforced.

Common Disputes from Non-Compete Clauses in India

Disagreements regarding non-compete agreements usually occur where an agreement’s terms are ambiguous, presumptively overbroad, or poorly worded.

1. Employer-Employee Conflicts
   • Employers’ objectives: Safeguarding secret information, customer accounts, and market share.
   • Employee Concerns: The kind of restrictions that make it difficult to pursue a career or limit job opportunities.
   • Example: An IT employee in Bangalore was prohibited from joining a competing firm for one year. The court struck down the clause because it imposed an unreasonable restriction on a means of livelihood.
2. Startups and Innovation
   • Hiring employees subject to non-compete agreements can be difficult for startups.
   • Employees who transition to startups may be concerned about litigation from past employers.
   • Case in Point: A software developer was sued for joining a startup, claiming it used proprietary code.
3. Cross-Jurisdictional Issues
   • Multinational companies operating in India have complexities arising from differing laws in different jurisdictions.
   • It is important to take proper legal consideration while enforcing non-compete agreements across the nations.
4. Effect on Competition in the Industry
   • Restrictive covenants can, in some sectors, inhibit competition.
   • Courts try to weigh protection against fairness in a competitive industry.

These disputes underscore the need for clear, fair, and enforceable agreements.

How to Resolve Non-Compete Clause Disputes Effectively

If these non-compete clauses are not dealt with correctly then any disputes revolving surrounding them can become exponentially worse. Here are some actionable steps that can effectively address such conflicts.

1. Open Communication
   • Facilitate conversations between the parties to determine issues.
   • It allows employers to justify their clauses, but employees can negotiate to have less restrictive ones.
2. Mediation and Negotiation
   • Get a neutral mediator to facilitate a discussion and reach a compromise.
   • One avoids litigation costs as mediation is less expensive.
3. Legal Action
   • Parties may turn to the court if disputes are unresolved.
   • Clauses of this nature must be reasonable, proportional, and in line with public policy, according to courts.
4. Preparation And Modification Of Agreements
   • Specify the duration, territorial scope, and prohibited acts.
   • Refresh agreements regularly to ensure they reflect changing roles and practices in the industry.

If the preventive measures were put in place, neither the employer nor the employee would take the matter to a confrontation.

Role of Employers and Employees in Resolving Disputes

Ultimately, both sides have a part to play in effectively resolving conflicts with non-compete clauses.

Employers

• Explain why restrictive covenants are part of what they are.
• Compensate them for accepting the restrictions.
• Do not make general or vague clauses that could be rejected by a court.

Employees

• Always read agreements before you sign them.
• Take issue with overly restrictive clauses.
• Engage counsel to negotiate amendments or waivers.

Key Case Laws on Non-Compete Clauses in India

Examining precedent-setting cases teaches us how to resolve disputes:

1. Niranjan Shankar Golikari v. Century Spinning:
   • The court upheld the enforceability of non-compete covenants during employment, provided the restrictions were reasonable.
2. Superintendence Company of India v. Krishan Murgai
   • In this case, the court held that non-compete clauses that apply after the termination of employment constitute a restraint on trade and, as such, are unenforceable.
3. Percept D’Mark v. Zaheer Khan (2007, SC):
   • The Supreme Court emphasized that non-compete clauses that conflict with public policy will not be upheld.

These cases underscore the need to balance business interests and individual rights.

Practical Tips for Drafting Non-Compete Clauses

To avoid disputes, carefully drafting enforceable non-compete clauses is essential. Here are some tips:

1. Be Specific:
   • Clearly define the restrictive activities.
2. Limit Scope:
   • Keep the geographical scope and duration of the scope reasonable.
3. Provide Compensation:
   • Provide benefits, including severance pay, to employees who agree to restrictions.
4. Review Regularly:
   • Update non-compete clauses regularly to be in line with evolving roles or market changes.

Frequent Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Are non-compete clauses enforceable in India?

Yes, but only if the restriction is reasonable. As a rule, any non-compete clause that seeks to enforce a restriction post-employment would be rendered unenforceable under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act 1872 as it amounts to a restraint of trade. However, restrictions during employment can be enforceable if reasonable.

2. How can employees challenge a non-compete clause?

Employees can challenge a non-compete by:

• Proving it is too narrow to prove.
• Proving it violates public policy.

3. Can employers enforce non-compete clauses globally?

The enforceability of non-compete clauses varies by jurisdiction. The Indian Courts usually give precedence to the employee’s right to livelihood over a non-compete agreement.

4. What alternatives to non-compete clauses exist?

Employers can use:

• Non-solicitation agreements: To prevent employees from raiding clients, and/or staff.
• Confidentiality clauses: To protect sensitive business information without unnecessarily restricting employees from seeking new job opportunities.

Conclusion

Effective non-compete dispute resolution relies on clear, reasonable clauses that balance business protection with employee rights. Employers should avoid excessively restrictive clauses and ensure transparency in their agreements, while employees should be informed of their rights and seek legal counsel when necessary.  By maintaining fairness and transparency, both parties can successfully navigate non-compete disputes.

About Us:

Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.

We keep our client’s future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai, and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-8826680614 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.