Introduction: Maternity Leave Disputes
All working women should have the fundamental right to maternity leave to protect their jobs, pay, and workplaces under conditions before and after the pregnancy. Unfortunately, disputes over maternity leave are on the rise, with women facing wrongful termination, denial of maternity benefits, workplace discrimination, and other legal challenges.
While protective laws such as the Maternity Benefit Act, of 1961, exist in India, employee litigation over maternity leave issues remains widespread. A global workplace survey in 2021 revealed that 42% of women had faced some form of maternity discrimination at work. This includes demotions upon returning from maternity leave, pay cuts, hostile environments, and even unlawful terminations. This article presents various real-world case studies on maternity leave disputes and their resolutions to better understand how courts adjudicate maternity-related employment disputes. We will also explore best practices for employers to prevent such disputes and some steps employees can take to protect their maternity leave rights.
Understanding Maternity Leave Rights and Legal Framework
Before we explore actual case studies of maternity leave disputes and their resolutions, it is important to understand the legal framework that governs maternity leave.
Key Maternity Leave Rights: In India & Across the World
- The Maternity Benefit Act, of 1961, in India, entitles women working in establishments with 10 or more employees to a paid maternity leave of 26 weeks.
- Employers must provide full salary during the leave period and ensure job security for employees on maternity leave.
- Women cannot be terminated, demoted, or penalized for being pregnant.
- New mothers are entitled to maternity work flexibility, which may include telecommuting, or reduced working hours upon return.
- Non-compliance with the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 can result in legal action, penalties, and reputational damage to companies.
Case Study 1: Pregnancy Discrimination and Wrongful Termination
Background of the Case
In 2022, Priya Sharma, a senior software engineer at one of the top IT firms in Bangalore, found herself in an unprecedented legal battle. Having worked at the company for five years, she consistently received positive reviews, establishing herself as a high-performing employee.
However, everything changed when she disclosed her pregnancy in the sixth month. Just two months before her scheduled maternity leave, HR handed her a termination letter citing “performance issues” and “team restructuring.”
Shocked and Distraught, Priya reviewed her previous performance reports, all of which were exemplary. She also noted that no male colleagues were affected or impacted by the so-called team restructuring. Convinced that her pregnancy was the real reason for her termination, she decided to take legal action against the employer.
Legal Battle and Court Ruling
Priya sued for wrongful termination under section 4 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, contending that:
- Her dismissal violated maternity protection laws, under which she was entitled to paid maternity leave and job security.
- No other team members were terminated as part of the team restructuring, making the company’s conduct was discriminatory.
- The reasons stated in the termination letter were vague and inconsistent, serving as a pretext for her pregnancy.
Key Court Findings:
- The court held that the termination of an employee on account of pregnancy was illegal under Section 12 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which prohibits any employer from dismissing a woman or withholding her pay during pregnancy or maternity leave.
- The judge found no valid reason for Priya’s termination, especially since her past performance ratings contradicted the company’s claims.
- The IT company was directed to reinstate Priya and pay monetary compensation for mental distress, legal fees, and lost income.
Outcome:
- Priya was reinstated in her job and granted her full maternity leave.
- The company was fined ₹5 lakhs for wrongful termination.
- The ruling set a strong legal precedent, reinforcing legal protections for pregnant employees in the workplace.
Key Takeaways:
- An employer cannot dismiss a woman on the grounds of pregnancy, as it violates the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.
- Employees should maintain written records of their performance reviews and interactions with management, to strengthen their case in a wrongful termination dispute.
- Women who are pregnant or on maternity leave are protected from workplace discrimination, and have legal recourse against unfair treatment.
Case Study 2: Disallowance of Maternity Benefits in the Private-Sector
Background of the Case
Radhika Verma, an HR executive at a private firm in Mumbai, had worked hard for three (3) years. When she informed HR about her pregnancy and applied for maternity leave benefits, she was shocked to be denied paid leave.
Her company claimed that:
- Their corporate policy did not include paid maternity leave for employees with less than four years of service.
- They classified her role as a “temporary position,” even though she had worked there full-time for three years.
- Frustrated by the denial of her maternity benefits, Radhika decided to challenge the company’s policy.
Legal Battle and Court Ruling
Radhika filed a complaint with the Labor Court, arguing that:
- Company policy cannot override statutory maternity leave laws, which entitle any female employee in an establishment of 10 or more employees to 26 weeks of paid maternity leave.
- Radhika was not a temporary employee, and the employer was misclassifying her role to avoid granting her rightful benefits.
- The denial violated Section 4 and 5 of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which entitles paid maternity leave to all eligible female employees, regardless of company policies.
Court Ruling:
- The court ruled in Radhika’s favour, stating that private companies cannot create policies that contradict labour laws.
- The company was ordered to pay her full salary for her maternity leave and update its HR policies to comply with legal obligations.
- The company was fined ₹3 lakhs for violating labour laws.
Outcome:
- Radhika received her full maternity benefits, allowing her to take maternity leave without financial stress.
- The court held that statutory maternity rights override any company policies.
Key Takeaways:
- The Maternity Benefit Act, of 1961, applies to private companies.
- Employees should challenge discriminatory maternity policies in court.
- HR departments must ensure compliance with legal maternity benefits to avoid penalties.
Case Study 3: Retaliation Upon Return from Maternity Leave
Background of the Case
Neha Kapoor, a marketing executive, was a key member of her company’s branding and digital outreach team. However, when she returned from six months of maternity leave, her employer retaliated in unexpected ways:
- She was demoted to a junior position without explanation.
- Her pay was cut by 20 percent, described as a “business adjustment.”
- She was excluded from high-priority projects she had previously worked on.
- Realizing that her career was being penalized for taking maternity leave, she decided to fight back.
Legal Battle and Court Ruling
Neha’s case was filed under:
- The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, which safeguards women against any form of discrimination due to maternal leave.
- The Equal Remuneration Act, 1976, which prohibits gender-based wage discrimination.
The court found the firm guilty of discrimination and ruled that:
- Employers cannot retaliate against employees for taking legally granted maternity leave.
- There is no valid reason for her demotion or salary reduction, as her job description had not changed.
- The company was ordered to reinstate Neha to her original position and restore her salary.
Key Takeaways:
- Do not demote employees returning from maternity leave or cut their salaries.
- Employees must document all workplace communications and salary changes to strengthen their case in disputes.
- HR policies should ensure fair reintegration for employees returning from maternity leave.
Case Study 4: Gig Economy Maternity Leave Dispute
Background
In recent years, the gig economy has grown exponentially, providing flexible work for millions worldwide. However, gig workers, including freelance consultants, delivery partners, rideshare drivers, and online platform-based workers, often lack access to traditional employee benefits, including maternity leave.
The biggest challenge gig workers face is their classification as independent contractors rather than employees. This classification excludes them from statutory maternity benefits, such as paid leave and job security, even though many work under company-defined hours and conditions.
A Delivery Executive’s Fight for Maternity Rights
In this case, a female delivery executive working for a popular food delivery platform in India became pregnant and requested paid maternity leave. However, the company denied her request, arguing that she was an independent contractor, not an employee.
Forced to take an unpaid leave of absence, she lost her entire income. When she attempted to return after her maternity period, she discovered that her account had been deactivated, effectively terminating her contract without notice.
Believing that her work arrangement made her an employee in disguise, she filed a case against the company, arguing that she was entitled to maternity leave benefits under Indian labour laws.
Legal Arguments
The case centred around a fundamental legal question:
Are gig workers covered under maternity leave benefits?
The woman’s lawyers made the following key arguments:
- The “Employee in Disguise” doctrine
- Although she was officially an independent contractor, the platform dictated how, when, and under what conditions she worked.
- The company controlled her earnings, limiting her ability to set herself a condition that arguably precluded her from any real freedom in how much she earned or the hours she worked.
- She was economically dependent on the platform, making her more like an employee than an independent contractor.
- Violation of Women’s Rights Under the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961
- The Maternity Benefit Act, of 1961, was intended for the protect all working women, irrespective of their employment classification.
- Gig workers who provide essential labour for large corporations should not be denied basic rights such as paid maternity leave and job security.
- International Precedents on Gig Workers’ Rights
- The lawyers referenced international rulings, including cases in the U.K. and the E.U., where gig workers were classified as employees to grant them access to labour rights.
- A series of lawsuits in the US and Europe led to new regulations against worker exploitation in the gig economy.
The company defended its stance, saying in part that:
- Gig workers assume the risks and flexibility associated with independent contracting.
- Granting maternity benefits would fundamentally alter the gig economy model and make it financially unstable.
- Freelancers, contractors, or platform workers are not explicitly covered under the Maternity Benefit Act, of 1961.
Outcome and Implications
- The labour court ruled in favour of the gig worker, setting a potential landmark precedent after months of legal wrangling.
- The company was ordered to compensate her for lost earnings during maternity leave, and in effect, recognize maternity protection for gig workers.
- The ruling ignited discussions on the rights of gig workers in India and triggered conversations on amending the labour code to explicitly provide maternity leave coverage for platform-based workers.
Key Takeaways:
- Workers in the gig economy may be entitled to maternity benefits depending on the nature of their work.
- Legal cases increasingly favour gig workers and uphold their labour rights.
- The Legal Takeaway: Companies in the gig economy should proactively establish maternity benefits policy to avoid litigation and reputational damage.
Preventing Maternity Leave Disputes
Best Practices for Employers
Create Detailed Maternity Leave Policies
The first step in avoiding disputes is to have a clear, legally compliant maternity leave policy. HR teams should ensure that:
- Policies align with local labour laws.
- Eligibility criteria, tenure requirements, and benefits are well-defined.
- Employees have access to clear Information about their maternity leave rights.
Management training
- Most maternity leave disputes arise because managers lack knowledge of the maternity leave laws or misinterpret them. Employers should:
- Provide training on maternity leave laws, discrimination laws, and employer obligations.
- Develop anti-retaliation policies to protect returning mothers from demotions, pay cuts, or terminations.
Keep Lines of Communication Open
- Employees should feel comfortable discussing maternity leave concerns without fear of retaliation.
- There should be a dedicated HR contact for maternity-related queries and disputes.
- Employers can implement anonymous reporting mechanisms to allow employees to raise concerns about violations.
Guidance for Employees
Understand Your Rights
- Employees should familiarize themselves with maternity leave laws, such as the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961.
- Gig workers, contract employees, and freelancers should check whether they are eligible for maternity benefits.
Maintain Documentation
- Employees must maintain records of the following:
- Emails and messages related to maternity leave requests.
- Performance reviews to counter false termination claims.
- Paycheck and benefits statement to contest any illegal deductions.
Seek Support When Needed
- If maternity leave is denied or challenged, employees should seek help from:
- HR departments (if the issue can be resolved internally).
- Labor law attorneys for legal consultation.
- Advocacy groups and women’s rights organizations for additional support.
(FAQ) Frequently asked questions
1. Can an employer refuse maternity leave due to company policy?
No, Statutory maternity leave laws supersede company policies. Violation of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, by the employer shall be punishable under that Act.
2. What steps can I take if I face discrimination after announcing my pregnancy?
- Document everything down (emails, messages, meeting notes).
- Report the issue in writing to HR.
- Consult an employment law expert as soon as possible.
- If the issue remains unresolved after following internal procedures, file a formal complaint with the Labor Commissioner.
3. Do gig workers receive maternity leave benefits?
This varies by jurisdiction. Some legal precedents suggest that gig workers may be eligible for maternity benefits if their working conditions resemble those of employees. Labor courts increasingly tend to favour workers in such disputes.
4. What helps employees’ transition back to work after maternity leave?
Employers can ease the transition by:
- Incentivizing flexible work arrangements (hybrid or remote).
- Implementing reintegration training programs.
- Ensuring pay equity (no salary reduction after maternity leave).
Conclusion
Maternity leave disputes remain one of the biggest workplace issues to day. Case studies on maternity leave disputes and resolutions demonstrate that court increasingly rule in favour of women’s employment protection rights. However, many businesses still fail comply to these laws, leading to unnecessary litigation.
Key Takeaways:
Employees must be aware of their right
- and take the initiative in claiming maternity leave benefits.
- Employers should implement equitable and legally compliant maternity policies to avoid costly legal disputes.
- Gig workers may soon gain more legal rights, as courts worldwide increasingly recognize their need for maternity benefits.
About Us
Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.
We keep our clients future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, of 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai, and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-8826680614 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.