Welcome to the world of non-competition agreements, where you spend years of your professional life working for a firm, learning all the ins and outs of an industry, building relationships, and developing a skillset, and then you are told that you cannot work for a competitor or start your organization for some time after you walk out the door! Non-compete clauses in employment contracts are a prevalent yet contentious amendment that inhibits employees from pursuing better opportunities by limiting their ability to work for competing firms.
A non-compete clause is a contractual agreement between an employer and employee that prevents the latter from working with a competitor or establishing a competing business within a specific timeframe, industry, or geographical area. They are intended to protect trade secrets, proprietary information, and business interests and ensure that an employer’s investment in its workforce doesn’t compare to a gift to competitors. But what is their legal enforceability in India?
This guide explores the nature of non-compete clauses, their enforceability under Indian law, what employers should consider, employees’ rights, key judicial precedents, and best practices for drafting enforceable clauses. Whether you’re an HR professional, employer, or employee, understanding the legality and practicality of non-compete clauses in India is essential for ensuring compliance with employment law and fair workplace practices.
What is a Non-Compete Clause?
A non-compete clause is a clause in a contract that prohibits an employee from working in a competing position or starting a competing company concerning the employer’s business.
- Such clauses typically impose restrictions based on industry, geography, and time.
- Safeguard the employer’s proprietary information, IP, confidential data, trade secrets, and business interests.
- IT and software development (to guard so-called proprietary technology).
- Pharmaceutical and Healthcare (to protect research & development insights).
- Legal and consultancy firms (so you don’t lose clients to consultants).
- Finance and investment companies (to avoid leaks of insider knowledge).
- Difference between non-compete, non-solicitation, and confidentiality clauses:
- Non-compete: Restricts employment with direct competitors.
- Non-solicitation: Prevents poaching clients or employees.
- Confidentiality clause: Used to deter disclosure of trade secrets.
Can Non-Compete Clauses Be Enforced in India?
- Under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, any agreement in restraint of trade is void and unenforceable.
- Unlike U.S. or European laws, Indian law does not permit post-employment non-compete clauses..
- Supreme Court decisions regarding non-compete clauses:
- In Superintendence Co. of India v. Krishan Murgai (1980), the enforceability of the post-employment non-compete clause was denied by the court.
- Percept D’Mark (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Zaheer Khan (2006), The Supreme Court ruled that a contract that puts a restriction on trade after employment is void under Section 27.
- Exceptions:
- A non-compete is enforceable on the job.
- Reasonably drafted confidentiality and non-solicitation clauses.
- If an employee received substantial monetary damages in a settlement, courts may allow some restrictions.
Key Considerations for Employers When Drafting Non-Compete Clauses
- Employers need to ensure that limitations are reasonable to avoid legal challenges.
- Factors to consider:
- Length: Courts usually frown on limitations that last longer than 6 months to a year after you leave.
- Geographical scope: Should be specific and not overly broad (e.g., not pan-India or global).
- Nature of the restriction: It is more enforceable to have a restriction on specific job roles or specific competitors than on the whole industry.
Other options available to employers:
- More stringent confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs)
- Non-solicits to keep each other’s poaching at bay
- Cash bonuses are better than golden handcuffs
Effects of Non-Compete Clauses on Employees
- Restrictive non-compete agreements can be limiting of employee careers and opportunities, leaving employees trapped.
- Legal recourse that employees with unreasonable non-compete restrictions should pursue:
- Read the Challenges section of the Indian Contract Act, in Court under Section 27.
- Seek the advice of your lawyer before signing restrictive employment agreements.
- And before accepting a job offer, make sure to negotiate a more reasonable clause.
- Dealing with non-compete clauses in employment agreements:
- Don’t sign anything without reading the fucking thing.
- Ask for a definition of time, scope, and compensation.
- Consider whether buyout clauses or severance benefits are applicable.
How to Enforce a Non-Compete Clause in India
- In India, this other aspect you should have to enforce a non-compete clause, is hard but not impossible.
- Courts tend to prioritize employee mobility, but may uphold clauses protecting legitimate business interests (e.g., trade secrets, client databases).
- Key takeaways from case law:
- Clauses that protect legitimate business interests (such as client lists and trade secrets) are more likely to be enforced.
- Most restrictions are not legally enforceable.
- Best practices for employers:
- Opt for NDAs and confidentiality agreements instead.
- Compensate for periods of restriction
- Implement well-drafted non-solicitation clauses.
Drafting a Legally Compliant Non-Compete Clause in India
It is a daunting task to draft a non-compete clause that is valid under Indian laws. Since post-employment non-compete agreements are generally unenforceable under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, employees should be careful to draft any such arrangements to protect their business interests without running afoul of any legal provisions. Below are the must-haves of an effective non-compete clause and a template for best practices in drafting a non-compete clause that avoids disputes.
Important Aspects of a Valid and Enforceable Non-Competition Clause
Although post-employment non-compete clauses are generally unenforceable in the courts of India, parties can draft a reasonable and fair agreement to optimize the feasibility of enforcement. Here are the key elements:
- Time Limitation – Courts usually do not uphold non-compete restrictions exceeding a period of 6 months to 1 year.
- Geographical Scope – Limited and reasonable geographical location at which the restriction is effective. It’s hard to imagine a nationwide or global ban holding up in court.
- Nature of Restriction – Rather than a ban on joining any competitor, carve out the particular roles, industries, or competitors that are restricted in terms of employment, i.e., focusing on particular competitors or roles
- Justification of Legitimate Business Interests – The employer should prove that the restraint safeguards legitimate business interests like trade secrets, client lists, or proprietary knowledge.
- Financial Compensation During Period of Restriction – Some courts are more inclined to accept non-compete provisions where the employer provides a monetary consideration during the period of restriction.
- Other Protective Measures – Rather than including a non-compete clause in its contracts, a business may include a non-solicitation and confidentiality clause to protect its interests while allowing more freedom for incoming employees in the workforce.
Template for Non-Compete Clause in an Employment Contract
Now, here is a simple template of a non-compete clause that includes essential features and complies with the guidelines set by Indian Law:
Clause [X]: Non-Compete Agreement
While Employed: The Employee shall not during the term of their employment with [Employer Name], directly or indirectly, own, manage, operate, join, control or participate in the ownership, management, operation or control of, or be employed by or consult to any person, firm, corporation or other entity that directly or indirectly competes with the Employer.
Post-Employment Restriction: For six (6) months following termination, the Employee agrees not to work for or consult with any competitor where confidential information gained during employment may be at risk of exposure, within [City/State/Region].
Non-Disclosure / Confidentiality: The Employee also agrees not to use, distribute, or disclose all proprietary information, trade secrets, and or client information gathered while employed during and after the Employee’s employment.
Exceptions: This clause does not apply if the Employer terminates the Employee’s contract for no reason or if the Employee obtains the Employer’s written consent.
Restrictions – To compensate the Employee for such restriction, the Employer shall pay the Employee INR X month-wise for such period of restriction.
Tips for Businesses to Avoid Disputes Over Non-Compete Agreements
To avoid lawsuits and disputes over non-competes, Businesses should:
- Show transparency – Specify the limitations in the employment contract itself and discuss them during hiring to avoid misunderstandings.
- Include clear definitions – Define what competition means, trade secrets, and confidential information to avoid ambiguity.
- Seek Legal Advice – Indian employment laws are complex. Employers should seek legal advice before including restrictive clauses.
- Utilize Balanced Agreements – Courts prefer reasonable and fair limitations. Employers, however, should seek to protect employees, but not be too restrictive.
- Educate HR Teams – Ensure HR personnel understand the legal framework and enforceability limits.
FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions on Non-Compete Clauses
1. Can an employer compel an employee to sign a non-compete in India?
No. Although a non-compete clause may be included in employment contracts, it cannot be enforced after an employee leaves an employer.
2. How can an employee challenge a non-compete clause?
Under section 27 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, employees can move courts to challenge non-compete clauses.
3. Are non-compete clauses enforceable while you are employed?
Yes. Non-compete clauses are permissible in India only in the course of employment (and not post-resignation or post-termination).
Conclusion
While non-compete clauses in employment contracts are largely unenforceable after termination under Indian law, other protective agreements, such as NDAs and non-solicitation clauses, offer more practical alternatives. Employers must ensure such restrictions are reasonable, fair, and legally compliant. At the same time, employees should stay vigilant, understand their rights, and seek legal guidance when needed.
About Us
Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.
We keep our client’s future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-9211410147 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.