Doctrine of Holding out & Position of Minor in a Partnership firm

Reviewed and Validated by: Aamna, Associate

Doctrine of Holding out, creating liability of a non-partner: Sec. 28

  • In certain cases, a person who is not a partner, may be deemed to be a partner or held out to be a partner for the purpose of his liability towards third party.
  • The basis of liability is the application of the law of estoppel because of which he is held out to be a partner or is deemed to be a partner by “holding out”
  • Law of Estoppel –if a person, by his representation, induces another to do some act which he would not have done otherwise, then the person making the representation is not allowed to deny what asserted earlier.
  •  The Doctrine of Holding out is a branch of the Law of Estoppel.
  • Therefore, if a person who is not a partner, by his representation, created an impression in the mind of the third party that he is a partner, on the basis of which the third party gives credit to the firm, the person making such representation will be held out to be a partner.
  • For the application of the doctrine of holding out, following essentials are needed:

Position of Minor in a Partnership firm

S.30 (1) –A person who is a minor according to the law to which he is subject may not be a partner in a firm, but with the consent of all the partners for the time being, he may be admitted to the benefits of partnership.

  • A partnership between the competent parties to the contract must exist for a minor to be admitted to the benefits of the partnership.
  • According to S.30(5), at any time within six months of his attaining majority or of obtaining knowledge that he had been admitted to the benefits of partnership, whichever date is later, he can elect to become or not to become a partner.
  • If he remains silent and fails to give such a notice, it is presumed that he wants to be a partner and on the expiry of the said six months, he shall become a partner in the firm.

Read anther article: Introduction to Partnership Act

If Minor Accepts the Partnership then

  • His rights and liabilities continue to be same up to the date on which he becomes a partner.
  • His share in the property and profits of the firm shall be the same to which he was entitled as a minor.
  • He becomes personally liable to all the creditors for the acts of the firm, retrospectively from the date of his admission to the benefits of partnership.
  • When a minor elects not to become a partner, his rights and liabilities continue to be the same up to the date of his giving public notice.
  • His liability up to his share in the firm, continues only till the date he gives a public notice.

If after attaining majority, he represents or knowingly permits himself to be represented as a partner in the firm, his liability on the ground of holding out can still be there.

Aamna Munaima Avatar

Aamna Munaima

Legal Associate B.B.A., LL.B

As part of Corrida Legal, I primarily handle matters relating to HR compliance, employment disputes, workplace investigations, and general compliance under employment and labour laws. I have pursued B.B.A., LL.B. from NLU, Patna, with a specialization in Corporate Law. After the implementation of the 4 Labour Codes, we are at a strategic pivot in employment law because although the central laws are enforced, we still await the corresponding state-level rules.
At Corrida Legal, I am also involved in drafting articles, primarily on employment and corporate law. What I enjoy the most about writing these articles is that they help me stay updated with changing legal developments and push me to think through real-life, practical issues that clients actually face. Based on my experience, I have found that what the law says on paper and how it is practically applied can often differ significantly. The articles we publish at Corrida Legal are not just aimed at simplifying the law, but also at addressing practical questions raised by clients across sectors, including FMCG, manufacturing, and others.
To know more about my professional journey or to discuss any aspects related to employment law, please feel free to reach out to me on LinkedIn.

Areas of Expertise: Corporate Law.
Fact Checked & Updated by Corrida Legal Lawyers

Our Fact Checking Process

As qualified Indian lawyers, we understand that our articles are relied upon the thousands of our readers who read our articles daily. We accordingly ensure that all our articles go through a regular process of fact checking and updation by qualified lawyers of the Corrida Legal team. Here's how we maintain high standards:
  1. Expert Review: All articles are reviewed in a periodical manner by Corrida Legal's qualified lawyers.
  2. Source Validation: We ensure that any resource being relied upon for the preparation of the article is of a credible Government authority. We do not as a thumb rule quote any law, circular, guideline or notification present on unreliable websites.
  3. Transparency: We ensure to clearly cite references and disclose potential conflicts wherever we deem it appropriate to do so. Our author lawyers ensure to highlight the concerns and caveats in their articles.
Curated and reviewed by qualified lawyers from Corrida Legal team.

Our Review Board

All our articles are curated and reviewed by our expert team of lawyers at Corrida Legal to ensure accuracy and relevance.
  • Unique legal perspective: Each article is assessed by our specialist lawyers to ensure that we add the unique legal perspective that readers are looking for.
  • Up-to-date Insights: We incorporate the latest research, trends, and standards and all articles are reviewed in a periodical manner by Corrida Legal's qualified lawyers.
  • Legal Accuracy:   Every article is rigorously vetted by Corrida Legal lawyers against current statutes, judicial precedents, and regulatory notifications to provide reliable, actionable guidance that businesses can trust.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top