Introduction
Non-compete clauses are commonly included in employment contracts and business agreements as a protective measure in today’s highly competitive business environment. These clauses prevent employees or business partners from engaging in competing activities, or starting a rival business, once their relationship ends. But are these clauses legally enforceable in India? The answer is not straightforward!
Under section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872, any agreement that restrains a person from exercising a profession, trade, or business is considered void, with few exceptions. This typically means that non-compete clauses in India are unenforceable. However, Indian courts have varied in their interpretation of these clauses, particularly in the context of employment contracts, business sales, and franchising agreements.
As startups, multinational corporations (MNCs), and tech-driven industries have emerged, the need to safeguard trade secrets and sensitive information from the risk of unfair competition has become paramount. The question, however, remains: can businesses legally enforce a non-compete clause against an employee or business partner? To answer this, we must examine how the Indian legal system balances corporate interests against an individual’s right to livelihood
In this article, we discuss the validity, enforceability, and judicial assessment of non-compete clauses under the Indian Contract Act, of 1872. Additionally, we look at some legal alternatives businesses may consider to protect their proprietary rights. Explored our other article Role of Regulatory Bodies in Combating White-Collar Crimes in India.
What is a Non-Compete Clause?
A non-compete clause refers to a contractual provision that restricts one party typically the employee or business partner from engaging in certain competitive activities after the relationship ends. This clause is commonly designed to protect a business’s interests, including its trade secrets and proprietary information. It may include the following restrictions:
- Working for a competitor or starting a competing business within a specified time frame.
- Engaging in activities in a defined geographical area for a particular duration.
- Using insider information or intellectual property to gain an unfair advantage in the marketplace.
Where Do Non-Competition Clauses Apply?
- Employment Agreements: Restricting employees from working for competitors or starting a competing business after their employment ends.
- Business Sale Agreements: Imposing restrictions on the seller from opening a similar business within a certain period or geographical area.
- Franchise Agreements: Preventing franchisees from establishing competing businesses in the same market or territory.
- Partnership agreements: Ensuring that existing partners do not solicit Clients or start competing businesses.
Non-Compete vs. Other Restrictive Clauses
A non-compete clause is often confused with other restricting clauses which include:
- Non-Solicitation Clauses: Prevent employees from soliciting clients or employees after their relationship ends.
- Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs): Ensure that sensitive business information, such as trade secrets, remains confidential.
- Garden Leave Terms: The employee remains on the payroll, does not perform work, but is restricted from working for a competitor during this period
While non-solicitation and confidentiality agreements are generally enforceable, non-compete clauses in India are typically unenforceable due to Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872, which voids agreements that restrict a person from engaging in a profession, trade, or business.
Legal Scenario Based on Indian Contract Act, 1872
Indian Contract Act, 1872 – Section 27
As per the Indian Contract Act, of 1872:
“Every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind is, to that extent, void.”
Exceptions to Section 27
- Sale of Business: Reasonable non-compete restrictions between a seller and a buyer are upheld by the courts.
- Partnership Dissolution: Partners may agree not to compete after the dissolution of the partnership, provided the restrictions are reasonable.
Franchise Agreements: Non-compete clauses in franchise agreements may be enforceable if they are narrowly drafted and reasonable in scope.
Key Takeaways
- Employment non-compete clauses are typically unenforceable.
- Business-related non-competes (e.g., mergers, and acquisitions) may be enforceable if deemed reasonable by the court.
Case Laws Relating to Non-Compete Contracts in India
Indian courts have consistently invalidated post-employment non-compete clauses while upholding business-related non-compete clauses.
Important Supreme Court & High Court Judgments
- Niranjan Shankar Golikari vs. Century Spinning & Mfg. Co. (1976): The court validated the non-compete clause while the employee was still working with the company but voided it once the employee left the company, emphasizing the unreasonable restriction post-employment.
- Superintendence Co. of India. Krishan Murgai (1980): The court ruled that post-employment non-compete clauses are invalid, reinforcing the view that individuals have the right to pursue their profession after leaving a job.
- Percept D’Mark v. Zaheer Khan (2006): The court ruled that no agreement restraining a person from pursuing their profession can be enforced, emphasizing the fundamental right to livelihood.
- Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca-Cola Co. (1995): The court upheld non-compete clauses in commercial transactions (e.g., business sales), provided they are reasonable and not excessively restrictive.
Judicial Trends
- Employee mobility over employer’s protection.
- Most restrictions don’t carry any weight once someone has left their job.
- If they are fair and reasonable, restrictions on business transactions are enforceable.
Are Non-Compete Clauses Enforceable in Employment Contracts? Why Employers Use Non-Compete Clauses
- To safeguard sensitive information, such as trade secrets and client lists, which are critical to the business.
- Aim to restrict employees from joining competitors immediately after leaving, thus protecting their market position and minimizing competition.
Why Indian Courts Reject Them
- Violation of Fundamental Rights: Indian courts have ruled that non-compete clauses in employment contracts violate an individual’s right to livelihood under Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees the freedom to practice any profession, trade, or business
Public Policy Considerations: The courts emphasize that an individual’s right to work cannot be unduly restricted, as it goes against public policy that promotes economic freedom and personal growth.
What Can Employers Do About It Instead?
- Employers can use Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) to protect proprietary information and trade secrets without restricting an employee’s right to work.
- Implement Leave Clauses: Paid notice periods or garden leave can be used to ensure employees do not join competitors immediately, providing a buffer period without violating their right to livelihood.
Non-Compete Clauses in Business Transactions & Franchises
Non-compete clauses related to business transactions are different from employment contracts and may be enforceable.
- Duration & Scope – Must be reasonable (i.e. 1-3 Years).
- Nature of business – Must be genuine and not overly prohibitive.
- Geographical Limits – Must not unduly forbid trade.
Valid Non-Compete Examples:
- A business seller agrees not to start a similar business for 2 years.
- The franchisee commits not to establish a competing outlet within 5 km.
Invalid Non-Compete Examples:
- The employee is banned from working in the whole industry.
- The sale of a business presents competition forever.
Non-Compete Provisions in the Startup and Tech World
As the startup and technology sector evolves, the importance of intellectual property (IP), innovation, and employee know-how in a company’s success is increasingly recognized. Indian startups and tech companies often include non-compete clauses in their contracts to prevent an employee or founder from taking away proprietary knowledge and starting a competing venture. However, under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act of 1872, the enforceability of such clauses in India remains highly questionable.
Non-Compete Clauses: Why Startups Include Them When Hiring Founders and Employees
Startups, especially in industries such as software, fintech, AI, and SaaS-based business models, rely on cutting-edge intellectual property (IP) and trade secrets. They often include non-compete clauses in the following agreements to protect their business interests:
- Founder agreements — Preventing co-founders from quitting and starting a competing company
- Employee agreements — limiting employees from going to work for competitors after they leave.
- Vendor & Consultant agreements – Restricting service providers from servicing competitors.
Problems with Policing Non-Compete Clauses in the Startup World
Despite Indian startups’ concerns about intellectual property theft, Indian courts have found post-employment non-compete clauses are invalid. The main challenges include:
- Legal Enforceability – These clauses fall under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872, and the Indian Courts uphold a policy that promotes employee mobility.
- Right to Livelihood – Judicial decisions emphasize that preventing an ex-employee from earning a livelihood violates Article 19(1)(g) of the Indian Constitution.
- Knowledge-Based Economies – In tech start-ups, skills and knowledge cannot be “unlearned”, making restrictive clauses impractical.
Non-Compete Alternatives for Businesses
Since non-compete clauses in employment agreements are often unenforceable, startups should consider these other legal protections:
- Non-Solicitation Clauses – Preventing employees from poaching customers, employees, or vendors after they leave.
- Confidentiality Agreements (NDAs) – Protecting against the potential for employees and founders to share trade secrets, codes, or algorithms with competitors.
- Intellectual Property (IP) Agreements – Ensuring that all IP, software, and inventions created by an employee remain the sole property of the company
- Garden Leave Clauses – Allowing the employer to retain an employee on paid notice, preventing them from joining competitors during the transition period.
Key Takeaway:
Instead of relying on non-compete clauses, which may be unenforceable, startups should focus on creating strong confidentiality, intellectual property, and non-solicitation clauses to effectively protect their business interests.
Global Perspective on Non-Compete Clauses vs. Indian Law
Countries take different legal approaches to non-compete clauses. India has a strict stance on post-employment non-compete agreements; while other countries may accept them under specific situations.
How Do Global Jurisdictions Handle Non-Compete Clauses?
Let us see how India measures up with the U.S., U.K., and the E.U.:
1. United States (U.S.)
- Non-compete clauses are enforceable in most U.S. states, but they must be reasonable in terms of duration and geographical scope.
- Some states, such as California, have complete bans on non-compete clauses across all industries, including tech fields (e.g., Silicon Valley).
2. United Kingdom (U.K.)
- Non-compete clauses are enforceable but must be supported by legitimate business interests.
- U.K. courts will assess the reasonableness of the restriction in terms of time, geography, and industry.
3. European Union (EU)
- Non-compete clauses are permissible as long as they limit duration, geography, and industry.
- Some EU countries require employers to compensate employees financially during the restricted period.
Why India’s Response is More Employee-Friendly
- Indian law prioritizes an employee’s rights and economic freedom, unlike the approaches in the U.S. and U.K.
- There is a balance between employer interests and the Right to Livelihood (Article 19(1)(g)) of the Indian Constitution, which guarantees all citizens the right to practice any profession or engage in any occupation, trade, or business.
- This pro-worker approach fosters innovation, job mobility, and entrepreneurship.
Key Takeaway:
Unlike the U.S. and the U.K., where non-compete clauses are enforceable, India adopts a stricter stance, prohibiting post-employment restrictions to safeguard the right to earn a livelihood.
Practical Considerations for Drafting Non-Compete Clauses in India
Since post-employment non-compete clauses are void in India, companies must be cautious when drafting contracts.
Practical Steps to Improve Enforceability
- Avoid Overreaching With Non-Competes – Instead of a no-compete clause, focus on protecting specific business interests.
- Limit Scope and Duration – A restraint of 6 months or less, with a limited geographic focus, is likely to be more enforceable.
- Use Confidentiality & IP Clauses– Employers should protect their intellectual property rather than restricting employees’ future employment opportunities.
- Business Agreements Should Be Clear – In M&A transactions, non-compete clauses should clearly define the basis for the restriction and include provisions for compensation.
How To Draft Non-Compete Clause in Sync with Legal Precedents in India
Instead of using a standard non-compete clause, consider drafting a more tailored restrictive covenant that focuses on:
- Confidentiality & Non-Disclosure (NDAs) – Protecting proprietary data.
- Non-Solicitation Agreements – Preventing former employees from poaching customers or employees.
- Limited Non-Compete for Sale of Business – Allowing reasonable restraints of trade in the context of mergers, acquisitions, or franchising.
Preserving Business in Different Ways
- Use Garden Leave Clauses – Pay employees during the restricted period to make the clause feel less punitive.
- Triggers Advanced IP Protection Mechanisms — Use Patents, trademarks, and copyrights to defend significant business assets.
- Enforce Non-Solicitation Agreements – Instead of an anti-competition agreement, implement Non-Solicitation Agreements to restrict ex-employees from contacting former clients.
Key Takeaway:
Avoid traditional non-compete clauses and instead use NDAs, IPs, and limited restrictive covenants aligned with Indian court precedents.
FAQ – Frequently Asked Questions
1. Is the Non-Compete Clause Legali in India?
Generally no. It is void, under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act, of 1872, with some exceptions in business-related cases.
2. Is the Non-Compete Clause Enforceable in India?
No, post-employment non-compete clauses are invalid. Employers should rely on NDAs or garden leave clauses.
3. What is the Maximum Duration for a Non-Compete Clause in India?
Long-term non-compete clauses are unenforceable in Indian courts. However, a reasonable limitation (1-3 years) may be enforceable in certain business-related circumstances.
4. Can Startups Enforce a Non-Compete Clause Against Employees?
Yes, a startup may have the ability to enforce a non-compete clause against employees.
Conclusion
Non-compete clauses, particularly in employment contracts, are generally not enforceable in the Indian legal system. However, non-compete agreements related to business transactions may be enforceable under reasonable circumstances. To protect their interests, businesses in India should focus on Agreements like NDAs, MDAs, and non-solicitation clauses, which align with Indian contract laws.
able under reasonable circumstances. To protect their interests, businesses in India should focus on Agreements like NDAs, MDAs, and non-solicitation clauses, which align with Indian contract laws.
About Us
Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.
We keep our clients future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, of 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai, and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-8826680614 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.