Processing of personal data is subject to the provisions of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (“DPDP” act). The organisations while processing the personal data are required to comply with the provisions of the act and must undertake to establish reasonable protection mechanism to ensure safeguarding of personal data. This has led to the realisation that the personal data is a valuable component in any organisation and poor management of the same is likely to create great risk to such organisation. Thus, the privacy impact assessment is a valuable process for any organisation to determine the risk that may arise out of such processing. The nature of how to undertake a privacy impact assessment involves a formal examination of the legal and functional mechanism which are implemented by an organisation for processing of personal data. Privacy impact assessment is an internal risk control instrument which is intended to align the data processing practice with the statutory requirements and the business expectations. Under the DPDP act, the assessment acts as a prevention mechanism which may be used as evidence to protect oneself from litigation or other potential risks..
Does the DPDP act require a privacy impact assessment?
In DPDP act regime, certain organisations may be classified as significant data fiduciary based on the grounds stated under DPDP act. These entities are usually engaged in the high-volume processing activities. The DPDP act mandates that such entities are mandatorily required to conduct the privacy impact assessment. Thus, the process of conducting the privacy impact assessment is not mandatory on all entities.
According to the DPDP act, the Central Government has the authority to pass a notification appointing an entity as significant data fiduciary, depending on the factors prescribed under the Section 10 of the DPDP act which include:
- Volume and sensitivity of processed personal data.
- Threat to rights of data principals.
- Impact on sovereignty and integrity.
- Possible effect on electoral democracy.
- Public order.
- Security of the state.
The act also increases the compliance requirements for entities that are considered significant data fiduciary which are as follows
- Designation of data protection officer.
- Independent data audits
- Periodical data protection impact assessment.
- Evidence based internal governance control
Why does a privacy impact assessment need to be conducted?
The privacy impact assessment should be interpreted as the proactive risk assessment exercise. The main objective of it is to determine whether a proposed or existing processing activity may result in harm to data principals and to record mitigation actions to be undertaken by an organisation prior to its occurrence.
The objectives include:
- Identifying processing risks at design stage.
- Securing the the processing of the data is conducted for a limted and lawful purpose.
- Ensuring that the processing is occuring proportionally and only in circumstances where it is a necessity.
- Measuring security measures enforced to protect the data against data breach.
- Production of documentary evidence indicating due diligence with respect to the personal data.
In practice, a privacy impact audit is a combination of business structure, data mapping and analysis of the legal provisions. The risk assessment of processing personal data in India is focused in areas that process employee, customer, financial, or health related data.
When should an organisation conduct a privacy impact assessment?
A privacy impact assessment is to be carried out once an entity is considered to be a significant data fiduciary however it is advised that organisations undertake the process proactively rather than waiting for notification. It will be detrimental to the the statutory intent to wait until a regulatory notification of classification is published.
The organisations are ideally supposed to implement a privacy impact assessment under the following situations:
- Introduction of a new product or service requiring processing of data.
- Implementation of any AI-system which processes data such as AI-based profiling technologies.
- Digital surveillance of the employees.
- Biometric authentication systems.
- Outsourcing of human resource or payroll information.
- Commencement of international data transfer.
What are the key steps in how to conduct a privacy impact assessment?
The key steps which must be undertaken by an organisation while determining how to conduct a privacy impact assessment, the organisation must have a structured plan which involves a review of the legal and operational grounds for the processing, identifying risks, assessing potential harm to data principals and determination of the safeguards. This ensures that the privacy impact assessment serves its purpose as a preventive compliance exercise carried out before or during high-risk processing.
Under the DPDP act, this assessment becomes important where processing may expose individuals to significant harm or where enhanced obligations applies to certain entities.
The key steps are set out below in a defensible sequence.
1. Define the scope of the processing activity
The first step on how to conduct a privacy impact assessment is to clearly define what exactly is being assessed.
The scope of the assessment should be identified which includes:
- Nature of the project or system.
- Categories of personal data involved.
- Categories of data principals affected.
- Purpose of processing.
- Duration and frequency of processing.
This stage establishes the factual foundation for any meaningful risk assessment for processing personal data in India.
2. Map the data lifecycle
A privacy impact assessment must carefully map the data processing and must contain documents which substantiate the complete lifecycle of personal data, from collection to deletion.
This mapping of data lifecycle includes:
- Mode of data collection and category of data
- Storage mechanism and infrastructure for such data.
- Internal access controls with respect to processing and other activities.
- Transfers to vendors or processors and the agreements with such vendors.
- Retention timelines and deletion mechanisms.
Where international transfers are involved, a separate cross-border data transfer risk assessment should be embedded into the mapping stage to evaluate jurisdictional exposure and enforceability concerns.
3. Identify the legal basis for processing
The legal basis for processing under the DPDP act framework must be complied with to ensure that privacy impact assessment is comprehensive in nature.
The assessment should confirm:
- Whether processing is based on consent.
- Whether it qualifies as a legitimate use.
- Whether notice obligations are satisfied.
- Whether the purpose aligns with statutory requirements.
For entities notified under enhanced regulatory categories i.e. significant data fiduciary, this step also intersects with the obligations which require demonstrable compliance documentation.
4. Determination and prediction of risk to data principals
The most significant part of how to conduct a privacy impact assessment is the identification and assessment of possible risk and harm which may arise out of processing of the personal data.
The risk assessment needs to take into consideration the following elements:
- Hacker attack or data breach.
- Financial fraud or identity theft.
- Profiling/automated decision-making bias.
- Reputational damage
- Psychological distress
The assessment must make a distinction between:
- Likelihood of occurrence
- Severity of potential harm
- Scale of impact
5. Determine proportionality and necessity
A privacy impact assessment should look into the necessity of the data gathered to serve the purpose for which such data is collected by posing the following questions:
- Can the amount of data being collected be reduced?
- Is it possible to attain the processing results with anonymised data?
- Does the organisation have justifiable retention periods?
- Is the collection and storage of data digitally necessary or not?
Such proportionality review complies with the maturity of compliance in the DPDP act compliance framework on the part of organisation.
6. Determine and report mitigation measures
Once the risks are identified, the organisation should record protective measures meant to mitigate the risks.
The mitigation measures can be:
- Pseudonymisation and encryption.
- Role-based access control.
- Due diligence and contractual protection of the vendors.
- Multi-factor authentication
- Periodic internal audits
- Clear retention and deletion policies.
In the case of cross-jurisdictional transfers, mitigation should also focus on cross-border data transfer risk assessment India which includes issues like contractual obligation with data processorsa nd recovery mechanisms.
7. Record residual risk and obtain approval
Even after safeguards are implemented, some level of residual risk may remain and must be recorded under the privacy impact assessment. Such risk may be recorded in a manner which indicates the following:
- Remaining risk level.
- Justification for proceeding.
- Management approval.
- Review timeline.
Where applicable, this stage supports accountability obligations connected to significant data fiduciary obligations in India, particularly where audits or regulatory inquiries may arise.
8. Establish review and update mechanisms
Conducting of a privacy impact assessment does not end with documentation and is a continuous process. It must be periodically reviewed and acted upon by the organisation.
A reassessment is necessary when:
- Processing purpose changes;
- New technology is introduced;
- Data volume increases significantly;
- A data breach occurs; and
- Regulatory rules are updated.
How does cross-border processing affect the organisation and how it conducts a privacy impact assessment?
International transfers and processing of data drastically increase the risk associated with the processing. Risk assessment of cross-border data transfer in India will have to consider the differences in the jurisdictions, gaps in enforcement, and geopolitical risk.
The privacy impact assessment should examine:
- Whether transfer to the destination country is restricted by government notification or not.
- Contractual provisions with the vendors or data processors have been enter upon by the data fiduciary to protect the data.
- Requirements of data localisation.
- Mechanisms of incident response overseas.
- Access to redressal mechanism available to the Indian data principals.
The cross-border assessment is not confined to legal permissibility, an organisation must also determine the financially viability to ensure practical enforceability.
What documentation is required when conducting a privacy impact assessment?
A privacy impact assessment should be conducted in a manner that involves developing clear, structured and assertible documentation that can withstand regulatory review. In the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, accountability is not implied but proved. Effective documentation is a key component in the system of DPDP act compliance, especially where there is a potential of any increased scrutiny or where a data fiduciary is a significant data fiduciary in India.
1. Description of the processing activity
The privact impact assessment record should start with the description of the processing activity that is being reviewed in factual terms.
This should include:
- Scope and purpose of processing.
- Types of personal information involved.
- Types of data principals.
- Collection, storage, sharing, deletion data flow diagram.
- Technology systems used to collect, process and safeguard the data.
2. Purpose justification and legal basis
The documentation should be clear and in an itemised manner indicate to:
- Legal foundation for the processing of data.
- Meeting of notice and consent requirements.
- Reasonableness of processing.
- The presence or absence of any statutory exemptions.
3. Risk identification and scoring methodology
A privacy impact assessment must explain how risks were evaluated.
The documentation should record:
- Identified vulnerabilities.
- Nature of potential harm.
- Severity grading.
- Risk matrix or scoring model used.
This forms the core of the documented risk assessment for processing personal data in India.
4. Cross-border risk evaluation (where applicable)
If personal data is transferred outside India, the documentation must reflect the data mapping which is structured for cross-border data transfer and must conduct a risk assessment with respect to such transfer.
This risk evaluation should address the following:
- Jurisdiction where such data is being processed.
- Government restrictions or notifications.
- Vendor contractual obligation towards processing and safeguarding of the data.
- Enforceability of rights provided under the DPDP in the jurisdiction abroad where such data is being processed.
- Incident response and breach notification mechanisms implemented for such data.
- Accessibility of grievance redressal.
This section must go beyond mere permissibility and examine enforceability and practical risk exposure.
5. Mitigation measures and safeguards
The privacy impact assessment record must detail the safeguards mechanism which have been adopted to reduce identified risks with respect to the processing of the data.
Examples include:
- Encryption and pseudonymisation.
- Role-based access controls.
- Vendor due diligence findings.
- Data minimisation measures.
- Retention and deletion controls.
- Internal oversight mechanisms.
Each safeguard should be linked to a specific identified risk, demonstrating proportional mitigation.
6. Residual risk analysis
Even after mitigation, some risks may remain. A properly documented and conducted privacy impact assessment must undertake the following steps:
- Record residual risk levels;
- Justify why processing may proceed; and
- Document management approval.
For entities subject to significant data fiduciary obligations in India, this stage may require higher-level oversight or audit documentation.
7. Approval, review, and retention records
The final documentation should include the following details:
- Date of assessment.
- Names/designations of reviewing officers.
- Approval authority.
- Next scheduled review date.
Retention of privacy impact assessment records should align with corporate governance policies and audit cycles. The retention of these documents is essential as the same may be requested during inquiry proceedings before the Data Protection Board of India.
What are common errors in how to conduct a privacy impact assessment?
The privacy impact assessment procedure needs evidence-based and periodically analysis of data processing risks with respect to the processing of data at the concerned period of time. The common factors which lead to the compliance failures are seen when the organisations consider the exercise as a formal exercise but not a substantive risk assessment of processing personal information in India.
1. Unable to treat the privacy impact assessment as a routine process
A privacy impact assessment is not a one time process. Among the errors pertaining to how to conduct a privacy impact assessment, one of the prominent issues arises when privacy impact assessment is conducted as one time process and is never implemented again.
This failure is normally caused when:
- There is no re-evaluation of new processing activities.
- Systems of technology are updated without a review.
- The volumes of data grow considerably.
- Regulatory regime evolve and introduces new obligations on the data fiduciary.
2. Administering generic or template-based assessments without a contextual analysis
The other mistake in conducting a privacy impact assessment is the usage of standardised templates without customisation to the processing activity.
Common deficiencies are:
- Ready-made risk matrices that are not based on real operations.
- Boilerplate mitigating language.
- Lack of data flow which contains detail pertaining to the processing on a project-specific basis.
- Lack of capturing of rationale behind conclusions.
The regulators evaluate content of the privacy impact assessment rather than the structure of the document. Entities cannot escape its obligation under the law by providing a standard template that is not tailored to their organisation.
3. The neglecting of vendor and processor ecosystems
Organisation limit the privacy impact assessment only to the internal systems and disregard the exposure to third parties. This is a material compliance deficiency in how to conduct a privacy impact assessment.
Common oversights while preparing a privacy impact assessment include:
- Failure to evaluate cloud service vendors.
- Keeping payroll or HR outsourcing vendors.
- Lacking assessment of cybersecurity of processors.
- Lack of contract risk division.
In case of transfer of personal data beyond the country of India, it is especially problematic when a structured Cross-border data transfer risk assessment India review is omitted.
How does a privacy impact assessment interact with data audits?
For Significant Data Fiduciaries, periodic data audits will examine:
- Accuracy of documentation
- Adequacy of mitigation controls
- Alignment between policy and practice
Therefore, the manner in which an organisation determines how to conduct a privacy impact assessment must be aligned with data audit standards.
What role does the central government play in privacy impact assessment obligations?
The central government retains authority to:
- Notify which entities shall be deemed as significant data fiduciaries
- Prescribe the content or mechanism for conducting the impact assessment requirements
- Publishing notification restricting cross-border data transfers to specific jurisdictions.
Regulatory developments under the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology may refine privacy impact assessment standards through rules and notifications.
Frequently asked questions
Does every organisation need to conduct a privacy impact assessment?
No, the privacy impact assessment is not required to be conducted by every organisation. The law mandates that those who have been classified as significant data fiduciary are required to conduct the assessment. It is however advised to all the entities to conduct the same to ensure that it is aligned with the best practices and in compliance with the applicable law.
Can consent eliminate the need for a privacy impact assessment?
No, the consent plays a vital role in allowing an organisation to conduct the data processing. However, it does not allow the organisation to determine and eliminate risk. Thus, knowing how to conduct a privacy impact assessment remains relevant even where consent is obtained.
Is a separate privacy impact assessment required for each processing activity?
Not necessarily, an organisation may group the related processing operations where the risk characteristics are similar.
What penalties may arise from failure to conduct a required privacy impact assessment?
While the DPDP act does not prescribe a penalty for absence of a privacy impact assessment, the non-compliance may aggravate liability in enforcement proceedings before the Data Protection Board of India.
Conclusion
In light of the abovementioned it is evident that knowing how to conduct a privacy impact assessment under the DPDP act is a crucial exercise and is an essential tool for determining the risk involved with processing of personal data. It requires mapping data flows, identifying potential risk, documenting mitigation, and embedding governance oversight.
For organisations, particularly those who may be deemed as a significant data fiduciarythe conducting of privacy impact assessment is an obligation in India. Such organisation will be required to establish a robust privacy impact assessment framework as the same is central to lawful processing, audit defensibility, and reputational protection.
About Us
Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.
We keep our client’s future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-9211410147 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.
Legal Consultation
In addition to our core corporate and employment law services, Corrida Legal also offers comprehensive legal consultation to individuals, startups, and established businesses. Our consultations are designed to provide practical, solution-oriented advice on complex legal issues, whether related to contracts, compliance, workforce matters, or disputes.
Through our Legal Consultation Services, clients can book dedicated sessions with our lawyers to address their specific concerns. We provide flexible consultation options, including virtual meetings, to ensure ease of access for businesses across India and abroad. This helps our clients make informed decisions, mitigate risks, and remain compliant with ever-evolving regulatory requirements.