Introduction – Notice period rules in India for employees
India has experienced an organisational difference in its employment world during the past few decades. Technology-driven and digital services industries are gaining its popularity among young professionals, while old and traditional companies are testing flexible work models. Against this background, one question that emerges frequently is: is it lawful when an employer refuses to pay an employee the salary due to the failure of the latter to serve out the notice period? Whether an employee submits a formal letter of resignation or fails to appear for work, both employers and employees frequently invoke the notice period as a reason to refuse payment or demand compensation. To respond to this question adequately one has to find his way through the maze of Indian labour laws, contract law and judicial precedent. It also involves having a clear view on the moral and economic basis of notice periods: continuity of operations among the employers, fairness and mobility among employees and consideration of contracts.
This article throws light on the statutory provisions of the Payment of Wages Act 1936, Code on Wages 2019, The Indian Contract Act 1872, the state-specific Shops and Establishments Acts, and judicial precedents. It is also vital to consider the real-life situation as the courts of India understand that the employment contracts are not settled on equal terms, and they balance the rigidity of the contract with the fairness. This article is made so that it traces the path of statutory rules through judicial interpretations to practical advice. The discussion will be anchored by references to statutory provisions and legal commentary.
The Concept of Notice Period
Notice period is not a statutory mandate, but a contract obligation. When an employment contract gives a notice period of thirty, sixty or ninety days, the parties are outlining their contractual obligations. Such contractual terms are generally recognised and enforced under the law. A notice period has two purposes: (i) it gives the employer time to prepare to continue on with the workforce by recruiting or training a successor, and (ii) it gives the employee time to plan their exit without losing a source of income and benefits. In most sectors, such notice requirements are identical in both directions, that is, both employee and employer should provide such notice before they end the employment, although the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act 1946and state Shops and Establishments Acts provide some minimum notice requirements for some types of workmen.
The Indian Contract Act 1872 impacts the clauses of notice period by sections 73 and 74. Section 73, in the case of a breach of contract, the aggrieved party is foregone to compensation for loss or damage as a natural consequence in the usual operation of things. Section 74 provides compensation on breach in case a contract has provided an amount of breach or a penalty on breach. The interpretation of these parts by the courts on employment contracts is that: reasonable compensation should be shown, and provisions on liquidated damages which are punitive in nature will not be put into force. Therefore, a clause that tries to forego several months of salary on an unserved notice period can be unsuccessful in the case that the employer is unable to prove loss of such nature.
Normal Duration and Variation
No statutory notice period can apply to all private employees in India. The notice period varies depending on the applicable law and the nature of employment. Under various State Shops and Establishments Acts, the notice requirement for workmen and employees differs and may depend on factors such as length of continuous service and establishment size. An example is that most states give one month’s notice after the completion of a specific period of continuous service. However, permanent government servants are required to serve three months before their termination under the Central Civil Services rules. In the information-technology and services sectors, the modern employment terms usually provide a thirty to ninety-day notice period to the permanent employees and fifteen to thirty days to the probationers.
To encourage the employees who desire to end their employment early, the employers usually provide a so-called buyout clause, which means to pay instead of serving the notice period. In a situation where the employee quits their employment before the stipulated period, the employer can invoke this clause so as to get back a pro-rated payment equal to the number of days not served.
Law Regulating Wages to be paid and Deductions
The Indian labour law has traditionally understood that wages are sacrosanct and cannot be withheld or deducted arbitrarily. According to section 7 of the Payment of Wages Act 1936, no deductions should be made to the wages of an employed person other than those permitted under the applicable laws. The subsection (2) is a list of deductions which are permitted: fines, absence from duty deductions, damage or loss of goods, house rent, services rendered by the employer, advances and loans recovery, income tax, court orders and provident fund contributions. According to the Payment of Wages Act, all payment by the employee to the employer is considered to be a deduction against wages. This means, therefore, that a recovery under the short-notice ought to fall into one of these authorised categories should an employer wish to recover sums. Practically, employers claim that non-serving of notice is absence without leave and thus, one can deduct wages in the period of absence. Nevertheless, they could not deny wages that had been accrued on days worked because denying wages that exceed the number of days of unpaid notice would be against Section 7.
Another benefit under the Payment of Wages Act is that the amount of deductions allowed in a wage period is restricted. As a rule, the deductions may not exceed 75 per cent of wages when the deduction concerns payment of the employer, due to housing or loan, and 50 per cent when it concerns other matters. The unwarranted tax deductions can be subjected to labour-commissioner claims and fines. Notably, salaries should be earned within the required wage time (usually monthly) even for employees not serving notice. Employers are not allowed to withhold wages owing as a result of services performed on the ground that there was no service of notice; otherwise, it will amount to unauthorised deductions under the Payment of Wages Act.
Code on Wages 2019 and Other Expected Developments
The Code on Wages 2019 consolidates four labour acts, including the Payment of Wages Act 1936, Minimum Wages Act 1948 and Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 and Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The Code has been notified, and under the Code, the wages are to be paid within a period of seven days after the end of the wage period and can only be deducted due to a certain purpose like fines, absences and authorised recoveries. The Code further states that employers are to provide wage slips that have details of deductions. With policymakers focusing on making it easier to comply, even when it comes to deductions, which can be made, the argument on allowable deductions ought to curb the controversy of salary withholding in lieu of notice.
Contractual Recourse under the Indian Contract Act
As the labour laws regulate payment of wages, it is the employment contract that determines the obligation of observance of the notice period. In case an employee resigns without notifying his or her employer, he or she can be sued by the employer for breach of contract and damages. The employer has to demonstrate that unserved notice brought about foreseeable loss, whether it is the cost of hiring a temporary worker or lost business opportunities under Section 73 of the Indian Contract Act. Section 74 permits parties to identify liquidated damages to be paid in the event of breach; however, such provisions are viewed by the court as maximum limits and will be diminished by the court in case of penalty. The Supreme Court ruled in 1963 that compensation must be a reasonable cost and not a penalty, even in situations in which a contract specifies the amount that will be paid in case of breach. Recent rulings confirm that employers are not entitled to impose a punitive forfeiture condition and can only receive compensation of reasonable notice.
Refusal to pay Salary on Failure to give Notice – Legal and illegal situations
In actual practice, the distinction separating a justifiable deduction and an illegal withholding can be quite indistinct. Legal commentary underscores the fact that no employer may withhold any wages that he owes to an employee for the time the employee has performed his work, without due cause. There are, however, a few narrow instances in which the salary can be suspended or subtracted:
- Deduction of unserved notice through contract: Where the appointment letter holds that failure to notice will allow the employer to make adjustments or deductions equivalent to the amount of salary due during the period the notice was not served, the amount that was deducted may be offset by the employer on the final settlement. The deduction is regarded as a recovery of an advance (the employer has already paid the employee at days off) and is probably permitted by Section 7(2)(f) of the Payment of Wages Act 1936.
- Absence from duty: An abrupt absence followed by resignation without prior notice may be considered by an employer as absence without leave, and a deduction from wages will be made. Section 7(2)(b) of the Act permits such deduction. The employer is, however, allowed to deduct wages for the days that the employee missed work, and not for the days the employee worked.
- Set-off of company property or loan: An employee will have money owed to the employer under a loan or advances (housing, salary), which the employer will be able to subtract against the final settlement of salary. Section 7(2)(f) and (g) permit deductions in the recovery of advances and income tax, respectively. Deductions shall be within the limits of the maximum permitted deductions of a wage period.
- Voluntary written consent: According to human-resources guidance, the salary can be retained with written permission by the employee, e.g., to obtain loans or bonuses. This is not often the case with notice periods due to the fact that consent is hardly ever provided when resigning.
Such Practices Which Are Unlawful Withholding
A number of practices are still common but against Indian labour law:
- Retention of wages that are already due: In this category of payment, the employer retains all the salaries that are due during the period of the notice until the employee finishes the last day or finishes the exit formalities. HR commentaries observe that employees have a legal right to receive their salaries on the days that they have participated in the work. Withholding salary (till Full and Final )F&F settlement practice is widespread in the IT sector, but it has no legal underpinning. Salaries must be paid on time; only a part of them, which is equivalent to an unserved notice, can be altered.
- Penalties: Clauses that forfeit a number of months of salary, irrespective of whether the loss occurs, will be invalidated. Not punitive damages but reasoned compensation will be enforced by courts. For instance, in SBI v. Ramesh B. Bansal, 2013, the court ruled that the bank was entitled to the pay for a month, but could not impose damages that were way above the amount for the notice period that had not been served.
- Set-off against statutory dues: Payments of statutory benefits, e.g. gratuity or encashing leave, are sometimes subtracted by employers from notice-period pay. The prevailing commentaries underline that unserved notice salary may not be set off against statutory dues of an employee.
- Unilateral alteration of notice period: A 30-day notice period changed to a 90-day notice period without the consent of the employees, and salary not paid in case of failure to serve will be regarded as a breach of contract. Such unilateral amendments have been disapproved of by labour courts as unfair labour practice.
The Facts of Final Settlement and Company Policies
Final settlements are done following the completion of clearance forms by the employees. It is common in many companies to withhold a portion of the salary until the employee returns equipment, produces handovers and gets no-dues in departments. Although it is an administrative practice, the law does not allow an indefinite withholding. Human-resources guides also accentuate that salary may be withheld until such time as required verification is done, and it must thereafter be released. Withholding of salary beyond a reasonable time can attract labour department complaints.
Perspective of Judicial and Tribunals
When we analyse the importance of judicial precedents, it can be understood that labour laws gave the skeleton, while the decisions of the courts gave the flesh. Courts analyse the question of whether the employer has fulfilled statutory requirements and whether the clauses in the contracts are reasonable and fair. The guiding principles are reflected in a number of cases.
In one case, where the employee resigned without giving the required notice, the employer has been found to have taken away six months of salary on final settlement on the basis of a clause in the letter of appointment. The Delhi HC ruled that a provision that provides a penalty of forfeiture of six months’ salary for thirty days’ notice was penal. The employer might get back salary as per the period of unserved notice (a prorata amount) and no more. That ruling confirms that deductions should be reasonable and fair when compared to the actual unserved term and underlines the interdependence between Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act and employment contracts.
In a case of 2016, the Karnataka High Court wondered whether an employer could recover the notice pay unilaterally by deducting the pay. The court noted that there was a three-month mutual notice, and payment in lieu of notice was allowed in the employment contract. In case the employee resigned before serving, the employer had deducted an amount of salary equivalent to three months. The court ruled that such a deduction was acceptable since it was based on the agreed compensation of breach in the contract and was not greater than the unearned period. The ruling supports the fact that when reasonable, clear contractual terms on payment in lieu of notice are binding.
In one Gujarat High Court case, employees were objecting to a policy that denied them a salary increment and other benefits when employees were denied their notice, leaving their jobs. The court invalidated the policy on the basis that denying benefits that are not related to the period of notice was an unfair labour practice. The employers are not supposed to impose anything other than reasonable compensation on the unserved notice; non-surgical benefits or termination certificates against the employees is unlawful.
Employers’ Rights and Employees’ Rights
The employers have a legitimate reason for asking for notice in order to ensure the stability of operations. The cost of recruiting and training is very high, and resignation may occur suddenly, derailing the delivery of the project. Legally, the rights of the employers are as follows:
- Recovery of notice pay: In case an employee does not present a notice which he is required to give, the employer may withhold a moderate sum equivalent to the time which he has not served or claim the same in a court of law. Section 7 of the Payment of Wages Act permits the deduction of absence and the recovery of an advance.
- Claiming damages due to actual loss: Section 73 of the Contract Act has allowed employers to claim damages for actual losses in the form of temporary staff or loss due to delay in delivery.
The employers are obliged to pay the salaries and benefits for the work that was actually done and pay the F&F settlements that are not reasonable without reasonable verification. Failing to comply can attract the attention of the labour department and damage reputation and further turnover.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) – Notice period rules in India for employees
Is my employer allowed to deduct my whole wage in case I fail to serve the notice period?
No, the legal requirement of the employers is to remunerate the employees based on the days that they have worked. In case the employment contract allows it, they can deduct the amount, which is equal to the period of notice to be served. Detaining the whole amount of the salary until the last day contravenes the Payment of Wages Act unless it has been written in or the deduction is under authorised classes.
Is it legal to withhold salary because I have not signed an appointment letter?
There might be implied terms of customary practice even in the absence of a written contract. In the case where no notice was agreed upon, there is very little reason why the employer can deny the unserved wages due to the lack of a notice. The courts have ruled that a contractual notice provision is essential in a situation where the employer wishes to impose a notice provision and salary deduction unilaterally. They could, however, deduct absence from duty under Section 7.
Is an employer entitled to notice pay out of my gratuity?
No, statutory benefits like gratuity and encashing of leaves are safeguarded by distinct legislation. The notice pay deductions cannot be offset against gratuity. When the eligibility conditions are met, the employers are supposed to process gratuity.
What should I do if my employer blacklists me for not serving notice?
It is an unfair labour practice that employees are blacklisted because employees have the right to resign. In such cases, the employees can file a case against the employer in the labour courts.
Can there be situations where notice periods could be waived
Yes, a great number of employers allow paying in lieu of notice. The waiver can be requested by employees because of health reasons, moving or a personal emergency. Courts promote negotiation, and the parties should come to a reasonable settlement. In cases where employers have identified a replacement, or when the employee does not need to be present any longer, the employers can shorten the notice.
Conclusion – Notice period rules in India for employees
The issue of whether an employer can hold back salary in the face of failure by the employee to serve the notice period is in the realm of the fundamentals of the Indian labour law. The wages are sacrosanct and cannot be withheld unless it is authorised by the law. Payment of Wages Act 1936, Section 7 states that payment of wages without such deductions, excepting definite categories, and the only relevant grounds available to an employer are deductions for absence from duty or recovery of advances. Employer-employee regulations consistently affirm that employers have no legal right to retain wages without valid reasons.
The clauses of notice-period are based on the law of contracts, and the courts apply the same, provided that they are reasonable and proportional. The amount that the employer is allowed to deduct is equal to the unserved period of notice, but not above. Any provision that is aimed at sacrificing payments that are higher than the length of the inability will be considered a penalty. Benefits such as gratuity, which are statutory, cannot be deducted towards notice pay. Judicial precedents show that courts have struck a balance between contractual freedom and fairness, so the employees are not exploited by unreasonable clauses, but at the same time, the interests of the employer are taken into consideration.
Lastly, both employer and employee have a role to play in promoting a just employment climate. The employers are to write precise notice terms and conclude the final settlement in a timely manner. Employees are expected to know their contracts and report freely in case they are unable to deliver notice. With India being a nation of trust and human capital, the realignment of contractual rights and statutory safeguards will add productivity and harmony to the working environments in India.
About Us
Corrida Legal is a boutique corporate & employment law firm serving as a strategic partner to businesses by helping them navigate transactions, fundraising-investor readiness, operational contracts, workforce management, data privacy, and disputes. The firm provides specialized and end-to-end corporate & employment law solutions, thereby eliminating the need for multiple law firm engagements. We are actively working on transactional drafting & advisory, operational & employment-related contracts, POSH, HR & data privacy-related compliances and audits, India-entry strategy & incorporation, statutory and labour law-related licenses, and registrations, and we defend our clients before all Indian courts to ensure seamless operations.
We keep our client’s future-ready by ensuring compliance with the upcoming Indian Labour codes on Wages, Industrial Relations, Social Security, Occupational Safety, Health, and Working Conditions – and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. With offices across India including Gurgaon, Mumbai and Delhi coupled with global partnerships with international law firms in Dubai, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the USA, we are the preferred law firm for India entry and international business setups. Reach out to us on LinkedIn or contact us at contact@corridalegal.com/+91-9211410147 in case you require any legal assistance. Visit our publications page for detailed articles on contemporary legal issues and updates.
Legal Consultation
In addition to our core corporate and employment law services, Corrida Legal also offers comprehensive legal consultation to individuals, startups, and established businesses. Our consultations are designed to provide practical, solution-oriented advice on complex legal issues, whether related to contracts, compliance, workforce matters, or disputes.
Through our Legal Consultation Services, clients can book dedicated sessions with our lawyers to address their specific concerns. We provide flexible consultation options, including virtual meetings, to ensure ease of access for businesses across India and abroad. This helps our clients make informed decisions, mitigate risks, and remain compliant with ever-evolving regulatory requirements.