Subsequent changes in Registration and the Drawbacks of Non-registration of a Firm

Reviewed and Validated by: Shubham, Associate

Subsequent Changes and Alterations

S.61 – Noting of closing and opening of branches

When a registered firm discontinues business at any place or begins to carry on business at any place, such place not being its principal place of business, any partner or agent of the firm may send intimation thereof to the Registrar, who shall make a note of such intimation in the entry relating to the firm in the Register of firms, and shall file the intimation along with the statement relating to the firm.

S.62-Noting of changes in names and addresses of partners

When any partners in a registered firm alters his name or permanent address, an intimation of the alteration may be sent by any partner or agent of the firm to the Registrar, who shall deal with it in the manner provided in Section 61.

Read another article: Intoxication as a Defence

Registration and the Drawbacks of Non-registration of a Firm
Registration and the Drawbacks of Non-registration of a Firm

Sharad Vasant Kotak Vs. RamniklalMohanlalChawda

  • There was a change in the constitution of a registered partnership firm, due to the death of one partner and introduction of a new partner in his place.
  • After a conjoint reading of Sections 58 –63, the court held that by such a change, the registration of the firm had not ceased, & there was no need for fresh registration of the firm.
  • Information regarding the change in the constitution of the firm had to be given to the registrar.
  • Failure to comply attracts penalty & the person whose name is not added in the register, may suffer some disabilities.

Drawbacks of Non Registration

S.69 – Effect of non-registration

No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract of or conferred by this Act shall be instituted in any court by or on behalf of any person suing as a partner in a firm against the firm or any person alleged to be or to have been a partner in the firm unless the firm is registered and the person suing is or has been shown in the Register of firms as a partner in the firm. 2) No suit to enforce a right arising from a contract shall be instituted in any court by or on behalf of a firm against any third party unless the firm is registered and the person suing are or have been shown in the Register of firm as partners in the firm.

  • The firm can be called to be “registered” when the entry of the statement is recorded in the Register of Firms by the registrar.
  • This provision bars a suit between partners or between partners and the firm if the firm is unregistered.
  • Even if the firm is registered, only such partners can sue whose names appear in the Register of the Firm.
  • Fulfilment of 2 conditions is necessary before a suit can be instituted against a third party:
  • The firm must be a registered firm; and
  • The person suing must be shown in the Register of Firms as partners of the firm.
  • The court is of the view that a person who was not shown in the Register of Firms, by induction after reconstitution of firm, even though the firm was registered, could not file a suit for dissolution or accounts. This, however, did not mean that the registration given to the firm earlier, would cease.

Fact Checked & Updated by Corrida Legal Lawyers

Our Fact Checking Process

As qualified Indian lawyers, we understand that our articles are relied upon the thousands of our readers who read our articles daily. We accordingly ensure that all our articles go through a regular process of fact checking and updation by qualified lawyers of the Corrida Legal team. Here's how we maintain high standards:
  1. Expert Review: All articles are reviewed in a periodical manner by Corrida Legal's qualified lawyers.
  2. Source Validation: We ensure that any resource being relied upon for the preparation of the article is of a credible Government authority. We do not as a thumb rule quote any law, circular, guideline or notification present on unreliable websites.
  3. Transparency: We ensure to clearly cite references and disclose potential conflicts wherever we deem it appropriate to do so. Our author lawyers ensure to highlight the concerns and caveats in their articles.
Curated and reviewed by qualified lawyers from Corrida Legal team.

Our Review Board

All our articles are curated and reviewed by our expert team of lawyers at Corrida Legal to ensure accuracy and relevance.
  • Unique legal perspective: Each article is assessed by our specialist lawyers to ensure that we add the unique legal perspective that readers are looking for.
  • Up-to-date Insights: We incorporate the latest research, trends, and standards and all articles are reviewed in a periodical manner by Corrida Legal's qualified lawyers.
  • Legal Accuracy:   Every article is rigorously vetted by Corrida Legal lawyers against current statutes, judicial precedents, and regulatory notifications to provide reliable, actionable guidance that businesses can trust.
To Top